Banking and mortgage trade associations file briefs in Magner v. Gallagher


The Supreme Court granted certiorari in Magner v. Gallagher in November, 2011 and the banking industry and mortgage lenders are filing amicus briefs in the case because they believe that “if the ruling goes a certain way, mortgage lenders may face frivolous and unfounded lawsuits.”  One trade group is concerned that since the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau incorporated disparate treatment and disparate impact testing into its mortgage servicing examination procedures, the decision might either remove a disparate impact analysis  or  change how the CFPB looks at testing for disparate impact.

The Supreme Court  is addressing the following questions:

The Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful “[t]o refuse to sell or rent after the making of a bona fide offer … or otherwise make unavailable or deny, a dwelling to any person because of race, color, religion, sex, familial status, or national origin.” 42 U.S.C. § 3604(a). Respondents are owners of rental properties who argue that Petitioners violated the Fair Housing Act by “aggressively” enforcing the City of Saint Paul’s housing code. According to Respondents, because a disproportionate number of renters are African-American, and Respondents rent to many African-Americans, requiring them to meet the housing code will increase their costs and decrease the number of units they make available to rent to African-American tenants. Reversing the district court’s grant of summary judgment for Petitioners, the Eighth Circuit held that Respondents should be allowed to proceed to trial because they presented sufficient evidence of a “disparate impact” on African-Americans.

The following are the questions presented:

1. Are disparate impact claims cognizable under the Fair Housing Act?

2. If such claims are cognizable, should they be analyzed under the burden shifting approach used by three circuits, under the balancing test used by four circuits, under a hybrid approach used by two circuits, or by some other test?

The briefs in the case are here:

This is a link to an article summarizing the position of the banks and mortgage servicers:

The case will be argued in February.



 Posted by at 10:39 pm